The Judicial Advisory Committee (“JAC”) serves a unique role within the Eastern District of California.
The JAC brings together representatives of various offices and organizations that have an interest in the administration of justice
in the federal courts in the Eastern District. These include representatives of the Federal Bar Association, the
United States Attorney’s office, the Federal Public Defender’s office, the California Attorney General’s office, the lawyer delegates to
the Ninth Circuit Conference and other groups interested in federal practice.
The following documents are provided by the Judicial Advisory Committee. Any questions regarding these documents should be directed to Ken Mennemeier at
firstname.lastname@example.org or by phone 916-553-4000.
The JAC was established by General Order in 1997. The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 directed each District Court to establish
an advisory committee to study and suggest ways to reduce cost and delay in civil litigation in federal court. In the Eastern District,
the Court established an advisory committee that for the first time brought together representatives from the various committees
and organizations that had previously operated independently, to discuss ways to improve the administration of justice in the
District. By the terms of its authorizing legislation, the advisory committee focused exclusively on civil litigation. When the
federal legislation reached its sunset, the advisory committee disbanded. But, the Court recognized that the advisory committee
had been helpful in assisting in the work of the Court, and therefore decided to reestablish a similar committee with an
By General Order 348 the Court created a “Judicial Advisory Committee.” The Committee is comprised of
representatives from more than a dozen organizations and offices that have a substantial and recurring interest in the work of the
federal courts. The Committee serves as the Court’s liaison to the bar, and provides a means by which the Court and the bar can
exchange ideas regarding federal practice.
Over the past several years, the JAC has assisted the Court in numerous ways. Important examples include proposing
changes to the local rules, overseeing the District’s alternative dispute resolution program, and developing a juror outreach
program in the District’s Fresno Division.
These documents are in PDF (Adobe Acrobat) format. To view them you must have an
Adobe Acrobat reader plugin.